03 November 2019

Restorative Young Justice

I was intrigued by the news that Brian Michael Bendis was reviving DC Comics’s original Young Justice team, featured from 1998 to 2003. I didn’t pick up the comic books, however, because I was already confused enough by the publisher’s continuity changes in recent years. The alternate universes that got us to this reboot seemed even more tortuous.

I’ve now read the first collected volume of that series, Young Justice: Gemworld, and I’m just as confused as I anticipated.

Bendis has indeed restored the core of the original team: Tim Drake as Robin, Conner Kent as Superboy, Bart Allen as Impulse, and Cassie Sandsmark as Wonder Girl. In addition, he’s added three more girls, versions of established heroes/trademarks: Jinny Hex, Amethyst, and Teen Lantern (leaving out the original Young Justice’s Secret, Artemis Arrowette, and later members). Bendis has also established that the team has always been part of this DC universe’s history but wiped from memory by a bunch of hand-waving—the same hand-waving that brought those characters back together. But as for the story itself, it felt thin.

Of course, the original Young Justice series was far from deep. Launched by Todd Dezago and then taken over and scripted almost entirely by Peter David, it was a sitcom. It had catch phrases, laugh lines, villains and supporting characters whose names were based on puns. Sure, there were many moments of teen angst and very special episodes and all that. But fundamentally that series didn’t take itself too seriously. This team formed because a bunch of young superheroes liked hanging out, not because they had a crucial mission or psychological need. That’s why the unorthodox artwork of Todd Nauck worked.

Bendis has restored the group, but he hasn’t restored that tone. To be sure, these first issues are devoted to reintroducing and introducing the team through one breathless flashback after another. But I recall only two jokes fondly, one of them repeated and the other almost lost in small panels.

The new series doesn’t need to follow the same path, of course. So far, however, there just isn’t enough adolescent drama (as in Teen Titans at its best) or threats to this world (as in the intermediate, TV-spin-off Young Justice magazine) to make up for the loss.

2 comments:

Kuno said...

I haven't picked up Young Justice,but that it's re-doing what are basically old stories shows,I think,that the reboot was not completely successful.It seems that they did the same with the Titans from what I've heard,and they restored Superman's old stories too.So much for starting from scratch.I haven't read much from the new stuff that DC is releasing,but just trying to get into it it seems confusing.So from what I've seen,I share your sentiment.At first glance,I feel that DC doesn't have a clear direction either for the Titans(the original and the Wolfman/Pérez era) or Young Justice,going by the amount of re-designs and retcons.But I haven't read much,so are these accurate statements to make?
I've read some on your other posts on DC and comics,and you certainly know your stuff.It's been a great read.
But wasn't the archer girl in the original Young Justice comics Arrowette,not Artemis?

J. L. Bell said...

You're right about Arrowette, of course. The change to Artemis in the Young Justice TV show interfered with my memory of the earlier comic.

The Titans and Young Justice have been reconceived a lot, and probably will be again. The publisher is trying both to appeal to current teens (a moving target) and to older readers nostalgic for the earlier stories they read about those characters or similar ones. The high point for the Titans in terms of sales, critical reception, and influence was the Wolfman/Pérez series of the 1980s, and reboots are constantly trying to catch that magic again. I'm frankly a little surprised to see the same sort of nostalgia for the David/Nauck Young Justice, but I was willing to give it a try.