This weekly Robin plays categories with recent Robin controversies (which are really no more than kerfuffles).
Red Robin. DC Comics may already be revising the history of its Tim Drake character in the current continuity. Two of the much-hyped #1 issues stated that he had served as Robin. However, at the San Diego Comic-Con, Teen Titans, #0, writer Scott Lobdell suggested that that character went straight into the Red Robin identity.
Such speed could have been a response to fan complaints that new universe’s Batman had gone through kid sidekicks like they were Kleenex. But the change and the thought that this Tim has never been Robin (and thus never experienced even a version of the adventures people read from 1989 to 2011) produced even more fan exasperation. I wouldn’t be surprised if the final text of Teen Titans, #0, restores a bit of that history.
That said, I can imagine quick adoption of the Red Robin identity being quite in character for Tim Drake. His superhero origin would go something like this.
“Batman needs a Robin, sir.”
“Go home, kid.”
Two days later. “Is this Mr. Wayne? My name is Timothy Drake. Batman needs a Robin.”
“How did you get this number? Uh, why are you speaking to me about Batman? Hello? Hello?”
Three days later. “Good takedown, Batman, but a little rough. See, Batman needs a Robin.”
“Leave me alone! You know the last Robin didn’t work out.”
Six days later. “Hello, Batman.”
“Why are you wearing a costume?”
“Nightwing helped me with it.”
“I told you both: I don’t want another Robin.”
“I’m not Robin, sir. I’m Red Robin!”
“Sigh. All right.”
Old Robin. Retronaut shared a portfolio of Andy Warhol and Nico dressed up as the Dynamic Duo for a magazine photo shoot in 1967. This was of course during the era of television-fueled Batman camp.
TOMORROW: Controversies for letters B, I, and N.