tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28103455.post247827680621451828..comments2024-03-09T05:53:59.542-05:00Comments on Oz and Ends: Wheeeeeee!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28103455.post-77486936956023410832012-12-24T22:27:57.271-05:002012-12-24T22:27:57.271-05:00World's Finest cover art bears no relation to ...<i>World's Finest</i> cover art bears no relation to the stories inside in this period. In fact, Batman and Superman wouldn't even meet in the comics continuity for another few years. (They had already met on radio.)<br /><br />Kramer was able to invoke Neill's precedent for endpaper art that barely connected to the book's story. Even so, I think the <i>Shaggy Man</i> endpapers are unusually imaginative—I might even prefer that story to the book itself.J. L. Bellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15405157000473731801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28103455.post-44931686391944943772012-12-24T21:51:08.519-05:002012-12-24T21:51:08.519-05:00Is there any explanation inside? Or are the covers...Is there any explanation inside? Or are the covers really unrelated to the stories within?<br /><br />I remember in the Bugle story about Frank Kramer he responded to Jack Snow's pique over the fanciful endpapers for Shaggy Man by saying the endpapers weren't supposed to illustrate the story but to provide more space for the imagination. Or something like that. Glenn Ingersollhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10674475308395975995noreply@blogger.com